Hyrican PC A320M PRO-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHyrican PC A320M PRO-E  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star A320M PRO-E (MS-7A36)
Memory17.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190115
Uptime10.5 Days
Run DateAug 10 '21 at 20:55
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
60% Good
Memory 63.7
1-Core 102
2-Core 184
65% 116 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 584
52% 443 Pts
64-Core 572
35% 572 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 60%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8627) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.3% Poor
Lighting 35.8
Reflection 46.6
Parallax 37.7
29% 40 fps
MRender 37.1
Gravity 37.2
Splatting 26.4
27% 33.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S-1T00 1TB
624GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 348 383 367 373 380 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 360
Write 376
Mixed 277
SusWrite 353
77% 342 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 35.7
4K Mixed 28.8
95% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 129
96% 127 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 120%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$36
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 11 4.4 54 21 168 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 431
Write 347
Mixed 314
SusWrite 71.5
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 30.1
4K Mixed 17.5
63% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 71.5
DQ Mixed 12.6
31% 65.7 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 55%
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
261GB free
Firmware: UG5000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 92 75 126 70 216 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 437
Write 374
Mixed 260
SusWrite 133
67% 301 MB/s
4K Read 8.6
4K Write 32.5
4K Mixed 17.5
53% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 65.6
DQ Mixed 45.6
46% 76.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 61%
Intenso USB 3.0 device 1.5TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 119 120 119 120 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 108
Write 85.1
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 118
69% 94.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 65%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
228GB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 87 88 85 88 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 131
Write 133
Mixed 19.8
SusWrite 88.4
119% 93.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
43% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT16G4DFD8266.M16FD Kingston KHX2400C15/8G 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.3% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 18.4
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 18.6
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 10 8 60 23.5" 1280 720 AUS24DA ASUS VP247
Typical PC A320M PRO-E Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Hyrican PC A320M PRO-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $309
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $490Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback