Gigabyte GA-Z390 I AORUS PRO WIFI-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 227%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 231%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics228% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z390 I AORUS PRO WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z390 I AORUS PRO WIFI-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191015
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 19 '21 at 21:45
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 93.7
1-Core 154
2-Core 307
101% 185 Pts
4-Core 596
8-Core 1,119
102% 858 Pts
64-Core 1,603
99% 1,603 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 103%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 4860 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
228% Outstanding
Lighting 344
Reflection 305
Parallax 343
280% 331 fps
MRender 367
Gravity 274
Splatting 194
218% 278 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 228%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,224
Write 1,670
Mixed 1284
382% 1,726 MB/s
4K Read 63.9
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 84.1
285% 99.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,013
DQ Write 896
DQ Mixed 1,015
744% 974 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Kingston A1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB-$175
151GB free
Firmware: E8FK11.T Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 684 522 522 522 522 476 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
149% Outstanding
Read 689
Write 876
Mixed 760
SusWrite 541
162% 716 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 95.4
4K Mixed 49.3
167% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 922
DQ Write 728
DQ Mixed 803
607% 818 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 149%
Great: 162%
Adata SU630 240GB
98GB free
Firmware: R1210A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 281 345 6.6 6.4 49 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 484
Write 366
Mixed 333
SusWrite 167
75% 338 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 90.4
4K Mixed 23.8
119% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 71.5
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 35.4
73% 141 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
684GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 187 212 212 210 212 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 147
Mixed 86.9
SusWrite 204
115% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 114%
Great: 112%
HGST HTS 725050A7E630 500GB
229GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 38 43 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 39.9
Write 39.9
Mixed 36.6
SusWrite 40.7
54% 39.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AR36C18S8K2HU416R 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 37.8
MC Write 39.3
MC Mixed 28.1
100% 35.1 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 49.1
SC Mixed 31.3
98% 34.3 GB/s
Latency 60.4
66% 60.4 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 100%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 120 42.5" 1280 701 PHLC221 PHL 558M1R
Typical GA-Z390 I AORUS PRO WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 2,356 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 I AORUS PRO WIFI-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $571
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback