Gigabyte GA-H410M S2 V2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics52.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive172% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H410M S2 V2  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210120
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 21 '21 at 10:51
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100F-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Memory 85.7
1-Core 132
2-Core 236
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 716
68% 563 Pts
64-Core 718
44% 718 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1365 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.8.1
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.9% Above average
Lighting 67.3
Reflection 64.1
Parallax 91.7
55% 74.4 fps
MRender 65.3
Gravity 72.5
Splatting 47.3
49% 61.7 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1031 256GB SSD
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS103200
SusWrite @10s intervals: 985 511 217 214 202 199 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
172% Outstanding
Read 977
Write 1,045
Mixed 962
SusWrite 388
190% 843 MB/s
4K Read 49.5
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 68.7
250% 93.8 MB/s
DQ Read 741
DQ Write 709
DQ Mixed 706
535% 719 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 172%
Great: 223%
Adata SE760 1TB
253GB free
Firmware: 9209
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 354 356 365 364 364 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Read 373
Write 356
Mixed 340
SusWrite 357
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 46.4
4K Mixed 25.1
90% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 215
157% 203 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 79%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
792GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 156 173 182 183 163 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 139
Write 151
Mixed 73.4
SusWrite 168
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 106%
ADATA HC660 1TB
787GB free, PID a63a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 139 141 141 140 141 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 149
Write 142
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 139
146% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
39% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
MC Read 33.7
MC Write 35.6
MC Mixed 28.5
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 37.9
SC Mixed 26.6
78% 27.4 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 50: 5R 8G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
50% 13% 108 322 248 60 40" 1920 1080 SAM0C39 SAMSUNG
History: Score 25: 2R 4G 3B | Score 50: 5R 8G 1B
Typical GA-H410M S2 V2 Builds (Compare 676 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H410M S2 V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback