Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics41.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200408
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 21 '21 at 11:20
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Memory 66
1-Core 61.7
2-Core 180
56% 103 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 272
35% 264 Pts
64-Core 337
21% 337 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E343) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.1.4
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.6% Average
Lighting 51.9
Reflection 54.1
Parallax 70.4
42% 58.8 fps
MRender 54.2
Gravity 54.2
Splatting 42.1
40% 50.2 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 100 480GB-$139
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM11.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 49 74 97 73 83 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 393
Write 318
Mixed 179
SusWrite 75.5
54% 241 MB/s
DQ Read 22.6
DQ Write 57.9
DQ Mixed 29.1
25% 36.5 MB/s
4K Write 26.3
4K Mixed 15
50% 20.6 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 90%
Seagate ST3200826AS 200GB
29GB free
Firmware: 3.03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 42 42 41 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
25.1% Poor
Read 45.7
Write 11.5
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 41.5
24% 31.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 37%
Samsung HD642JJ 640GB-$70
122GB free
Firmware: 1AA01112
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 75 77 77 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 68.8
Write 36.9
Mixed 47.9
SusWrite 76.2
42% 57.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
186% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GKE800UD102408-3600 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
67.7% Good
MC Read 26
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 23
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 18.9
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,877 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $697
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback