Today's hottest deals

Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory19.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150810
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateAug 30 '21 at 23:53
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 85.9
1-Core 98.5
2-Core 177
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 594
60% 486 Pts
64-Core 760
47% 760 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 78%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
EVGA(3842 2277) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
107% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 115
Parallax 147
108% 131 fps
MRender 176
Gravity 129
Splatting 108
109% 138 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 107%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
306GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 382 324 312 317 317 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 461
Mixed 357
SusWrite 349
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 78.4
4K Mixed 48.2
160% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 329
251% 339 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 106%
Great: 134%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$118
233GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1784 1647 1599 1411 1328 1364 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
282% Outstanding
Read 2,275
Write 2,081
Mixed 1,729
SusWrite 1,522
427% 1,902 MB/s
4K Read 53.4
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 71.6
233% 79.5 MB/s
DQ Read 714
DQ Write 442
DQ Mixed 620
451% 592 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 282%
Great: 410%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
1TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 166 166 167 167 165 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 96.3
Write 134
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 165
76% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2
368% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 108%
Seagate BUP Slim RD 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 116 116 117 117 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 114
Write 82
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 115
69% 93.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 66%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$14
28GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 106
Write 78.7
Mixed 26.7
80% 70.3 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 1
70% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GB-$70
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 38.3
MC Write 42.7
MC Mixed 39.5
115% 40.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 21.1
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 103%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 144 27" 1280 720 ACI27B1 ROG PG278Q
Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,371 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $410
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback