Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 145%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 145%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics181% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory21 GB free of 24 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 02 '21 at 13:20
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC-Rome
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Memory 76.6
1-Core 149
2-Core 250
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 463
8-Core 946
83% 704 Pts
64-Core 1,120
69% 1,120 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$793
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 5100 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
181% Outstanding
Lighting 258
Reflection 239
Parallax 265
210% 254 fps
MRender 298
Gravity 232
Splatting 171
184% 234 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 181%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 137GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,532
Write 1,449
Mixed 769
277% 1,250 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 39.6
4K Mixed 30.9
100% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 235
188% 261 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 71%
Red Hat VirtIO 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 407 405 411 411 410 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 41% Great: 110%
Red Hat VirtIO 2TB
773GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 407 405 411 411 409 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 41% Great: 110%
Red Hat VirtIO 4TB
610GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 138 146 134 135 141 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Read 202
Write 210
Mixed 89.3
SusWrite 138
117% 160 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.8
216% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 98%
Red Hat VirtIO 1TB
695GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1446 1440 1445 1436 1444 1443 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 37% Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 24GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 43
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 41.4
106% 37.2 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 38.6
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 87.1
46% 87.1 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 102%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 10 8 240 24.5" 1280 720 BNQ7F58 ZOWIE XL LCD
Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 618 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback