PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 19.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 64% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock 980DE3/U3S3 (all builds) |
Memory | 10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150904 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 14 '21 at 08:00 |
Run Duration | 207 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 48% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
55.4%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R7 260X-$120
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.2
|
19.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ocz-vertex2 3.5 120GB
5GB free
Firmware: 1.37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 23 19 19 25 34 MB/s
|
10.3%
Very poor
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 141 54 112 51 116 MB/s
|
64%
Good
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
102GB free
Firmware: X31000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 149 144 149 177 165 MB/s
|
63.7%
Good
|
|||
Toshiba MK5065GSXF 500GB
230GB free
Firmware: GV108B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 67 67 68 68 68 MB/s
|
38.2%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 9965525-033.A00LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 1146 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
37.9%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 8 | 5 | 60 | 21.5" | 1280 720 | SAM0569 SyncMaster |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 49x |
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 30x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 22x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 17x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 12x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 10x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $210 |