Acer Nitro AN515-52

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	16.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Acer Nitro AN515-52 (all builds)
Motherboard	CFL Freed_CFS
Memory	18.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190805
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 15 '21 at 19:44
Run Duration	206 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8300H 167,898 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	26.1% Poor	Memory 40.9 1-Core 14.8 2-Core 33.6 21% 29.8 Pts	4-Core 62.1 8-Core 106 10% 84.3 Pts	64-Core 108 7% 108 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile) 160,694 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Acer(1025 1265) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6089 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Lighting 15.8 Reflection 34.8 Parallax 24.7 13% 25.1 fps	MRender 40.1 Gravity 38.1 Splatting 23.9 27% 34 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB 27,523 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 135GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK61E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 23 50 65 31 102 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	16.2% Very poor	Read 247 Write 69.3 Mixed 85.3 SusWrite 57.1 25% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 5.3 8% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 16.2% Great: 91%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$35 109,999 User benchmarks, average bench 244% 104GB free Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 872 382 299 387 439 446 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	98.9% Outstanding	Read 1,017 Write 1,049 Mixed 968 SusWrite 471 197% 876 MB/s	4K Read 14.5 4K Write 34.1 4K Mixed 23.8 70% 24.1 MB/s	DQ Read 160 DQ Write 158 DQ Mixed 169 124% 163 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 98.9% Great: 297%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SF4641G8CK8IEHLSBG Kingston KHX2666C15S4/16G 24GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 16384 MB Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	42.2% Average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 16.9 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 6.8 17% 5.93 GB/s	Latency 198 20% 198 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	336	269	60	15.5"	1536 864	AUO61ED

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Nitro AN515-52 Builds (Compare 5,475 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-52

CPU
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	3,741x
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	1,733x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	2,902x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	1,509x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	687x

SSD
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	830x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 168%, 18,999 samples	255x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	196x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	602x
ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 42%, 19,360 samples	410x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	278x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16