Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics55.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive147% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z390 DESIGNARE
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191218
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateSep 16 '21 at 09:49
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$385
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 93.7
1-Core 150
2-Core 300
99% 181 Pts
4-Core 600
8-Core 1,133
103% 867 Pts
64-Core 1,582
98% 1,582 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 103%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Lighting 72.2
Reflection 63.2
Parallax 93.9
59% 76.4 fps
MRender 65.5
Gravity 75
Splatting 46.9
50% 62.5 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket Q 1TB
769GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT30Q.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1119 109 206 145 235 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
147% Outstanding
Read 1,176
Write 1,673
Mixed 1,189
SusWrite 324
246% 1,091 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 83.7
4K Mixed 62.7
194% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 723
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 287
249% 386 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 147%
Great: 305%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$178
1TB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 464 461 461 459 474 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 518
Write 477
Mixed 448
SusWrite 458
107% 475 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 59.8
4K Mixed 50.9
164% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 94.9
DQ Mixed 193
153% 222 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 111%
Great: 136%
SABRENT 1TB
398GB free
Firmware: RKT303.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1684 988 986 959 974 1002 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 100% Great: 100%
Seagate BUP BK 5TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 120 118 121 120 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
65% Good
Read 105
Write 126
Mixed 71
SusWrite 121
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.7
177% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 65%
Great: 67%
Seagate BUP Ultra Touch 2TB
930GB free
Firmware: 0004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 131 131 119 118 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 118
Write 133
Mixed 78.2
SusWrite 125
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
214% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$130
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 39.8
MC Mixed 29.5
102% 35.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 45.8
SC Mixed 30.2
92% 32.1 GB/s
Latency 60.5
66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 100%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 10 8 75 34" 1280 720 VTK0034 GNV34CB
Typical GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF Builds (Compare 1,784 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $1,026
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback