Blade Shadow Computer

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	82.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Blade Shadow Computer (all builds)
Motherboard	Blade ShadowM
Memory	4.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190103
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 30 '21 at 19:55
Run Duration	190 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	33%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 7,521 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU1 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	61.9% Good	Memory 70.6 1-Core 74.2 2-Core 143 56% 95.9 Pts	4-Core 288 8-Core 420 44% 354 Pts	64-Core 454 28% 454 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Zotac(19DA 1425) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	82.4% Excellent	Lighting 98.8 Reflection 126 Parallax 106 80% 110 fps	MRender 106 Gravity 107 Splatting 103 86% 105 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 110%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 275GB 1,797 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 493 Write 554 Mixed 512 116% 520 MB/s	4K Read 55.7 4K Write 45.5 4K Mixed 40.6 160% 47.3 MB/s	DQ Read 484 DQ Write 380 DQ Mixed 415 315% 426 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 108%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 215GB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 66GB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 59 60 60 60 60 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 43% Great: 88%
Qemu HARDDISK 1TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 103GB free Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 60 60 60 60 60 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 51% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Blade C2QJWGBT6237ZP-ZUV 1x12GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 109% 1 of 1 slots used 12GB DIMM RAM clocked @ 2400 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	104% Outstanding	MC Read 42.7 MC Write 40.9 MC Mixed 42.8 120% 42.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 14.5 SC Mixed 15.8 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 104% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 39: 4R 4G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
39%	16%	93	202	54	60	0"	1920 1080	BLD0101 S24F350

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Shadow Computer Builds (Compare 597 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 60%

Destroyer

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 52%

Yacht

System: Blade Shadow Computer

CPU
Xeon E5-2678 v3IntelBench 61%, 7,521 samples	416x
Xeon E5-2667 v3IntelBench 64%, 2,246 samples	147x
EPYC 7543P 32-CoreAMDBench 71%, 974 samples	24x

GPU
Quadro P5000NvidiaBench 89%, 8,562 samples	298x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	256x
RTX A4500NvidiaBench 146%, 1,594 samples	24x

SSD
HARDDISK 275GBQemuBench 89%, 1,797 samples	571x
HARDDISK 825GBQemuBench 88%, 37 samples	21x
HARDDISK 1.5TBQemuBench 75%, 3 samples	1x

RAM
282DEW7CTQ0QH4-0V7 1x12GBBladeBench 97%, 3 samples	3x
2UUHX2E3U314TS-2WF 1x12GBBladeBench 59%, 3 samples	2x
YN1J8O05X3T5EC-468 1x12GBBladeBench 60%, 2 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16