IBM 00Y8473

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive219% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory384GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 384GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardIBM 00Y8473  (all builds)
Memory377.8 GB free of 384 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140917
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 30 '21 at 23:54
Run Duration281 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2
Socket 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
60% Above average
Memory 72.7
1-Core 69.1
2-Core 134
55% 91.8 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 499
45% 377 Pts
64-Core 1,300
80% 1,300 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 60%
Great: 64%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5110e 399GB
319GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 393 394 394 396 398 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
219% Outstanding
Read 2,733
Write 2,596
Mixed 2,573
SusWrite 396
464% 2,074 MB/s
4K Read 70.4
4K Write 79.2
4K Mixed 65.8
233% 71.8 MB/s
DQ Read 292
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 291
221% 296 MB/s
Poor: 91%
This bench: 219%
Great: 219%
IBM ServeRAID M5110e 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 3.46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 842 819 821 818 812 816 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
248% Outstanding
Read 2,703
Write 2,555
Mixed 2,602
SusWrite 821
487% 2,170 MB/s
4K Read 73.7
4K Write 75.2
4K Mixed 73.3
245% 74.1 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 287
216% 288 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 248%
Great: 390%
IBM ServeRAID M5110e 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 3.46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 886 846 857 785 842 851 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
241% Outstanding
Read 2,578
Write 2,261
Mixed 2,611
SusWrite 844
465% 2,074 MB/s
4K Read 64.8
4K Write 74.7
4K Mixed 73.8
232% 71.1 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 289
218% 290 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965516-490.A00LF 9965516-490.A00LF 9965516-490.A00LF Samsung M393B2G70BH0-CK0 Samsung M393B2G70BH0-CK0 Samsung M393B2G70BH0-CK0 Samsung M393B2G70BH0-CK0 Samsung M393B2G70BH0-CK0 9965516-490.A00LF Samsu... 384GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.3% Good
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 22.7
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 5.5
19% 6.7 GB/s
Latency 95.3
42% 95.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 0 0" 1280 720
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback