Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateOct 11 '21 at 14:12
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 200GE Vega Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
40.3% Average
Memory 57.1
1-Core 59.4
2-Core 110
45% 75.3 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 139
18% 139 Pts
64-Core 107
7% 107 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU)
Asus(1043 876B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.10.1
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
4.58% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 7.4
Parallax 6.7
4% 6.23 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 5.1
Splatting 9.9
6% 7.23 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.58%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AST280 120GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: APMB601K
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 132 86 56 60 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
49% Average
Read 334
Write 327
Mixed 345
SusWrite 112
63% 279 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 29.2
4K Mixed 15.8
67% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 214
156% 202 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 49%
Great: 90%
Colorful SL500 512GB
66GB free
Firmware: SN07181
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 370 340 344 362 355 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 269
Write 331
Mixed 347
SusWrite 353
74% 325 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 43.3
4K Mixed 28
94% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 251
180% 232 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer D12.2361WT.002 PNY 8GBF1X08LFHH35-12-K 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.3% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 15.8
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 13.3
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,219 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $338
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback