Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics66.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive22.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime12.5 Days
Run DateOct 12 '21 at 03:52
Run Duration294 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 72.8
1-Core 113
2-Core 228
76% 138 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 669
67% 547 Pts
64-Core 832
52% 832 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
66.3% Good
Lighting 94.7
Reflection 89
Parallax 78.4
77% 87.4 fps
MRender 65.9
Gravity 81.4
Splatting 29
45% 58.8 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 500GB SSD
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900J13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 53 44 47 49 46 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.3% Poor
Read 117
Write 85
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 72.4
18% 82.5 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 16.4
4K Mixed 9.9
42% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 10.8
DQ Write 12.1
DQ Mixed 11.5
9% 11.5 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 96%
Sabrent Dual SATA Bridge 1.5TB
976GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 116 117 117 116 116 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 126
Write 38.5
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 117
61% 82.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 70%
Sabrent Dual SATA Bridge 1TB
464GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 57 59 53 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 119
Write 49.3
Mixed 30
SusWrite 55.1
46% 63.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.8% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 14.3
40% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 12.6
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 95.1
42% 95.1 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,058 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $337
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback