Default string

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Default string (all builds)
Motherboard	Default X99H
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210810
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 20 '21 at 01:42
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 6,890 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	73% Very good	Memory 88.5 1-Core 90.6 2-Core 167 69% 115 Pts	4-Core 311 8-Core 496 50% 404 Pts	64-Core 606 38% 606 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Nvidia(10DE 118B) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	3.25% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 3.6 Parallax 4.1 3% 3.87 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 5 3% 4 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.25% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 38,401 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 187GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0200S610 SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 414 418 418 416 392 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 470 Write 431 Mixed 363 SusWrite 414 94% 419 MB/s	4K Read 35.1 4K Write 84.4 4K Mixed 35.1 143% 51.5 MB/s	DQ Read 316 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 221 194% 290 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 95%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB 66,048 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 439GB free Firmware: GR2OA230 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 96 96 97 97 96 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	54.7% Above average	Read 93.8 Write 91.5 Mixed 35.5 SusWrite 96.8 58% 79.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 58%
Samsung M3 Portable 500GB 4,300 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 284GB free, PID 61b3 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	12.6% Very poor	Read 20.8 Write 3.3 Mixed 5 SusWrite 41.1 23% 17.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.1 11% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Atermiter 2x8GB 2,316 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 24 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (87^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	63.4% Good	MC Read 25.8 MC Write 21.5 MC Mixed 20.9 65% 22.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 16.5 SC Mixed 18.8 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 69 58% 69 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 70%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,527 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Default string

CPU
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples	1,019x
Xeon E5-2640 v3IntelBench 71%, 3,267 samples	957x
Xeon E5-2670 v3IntelBench 66%, 3,953 samples	906x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	486x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	478x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	458x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	331x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	171x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	150x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	1,365x
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples	488x
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	354x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16