Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II (all builds)
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210201
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 20 '21 at 20:31
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185 123,820 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	75.3% Very good	Memory 74.4 1-Core 103 2-Core 204 71% 127 Pts	4-Core 409 8-Core 735 69% 572 Pts	64-Core 1,088 67% 1,088 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 361 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Nvidia(10DE 109A) 2GB CLim: 993 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	3.29% Terrible	Lighting 3.6 Reflection 4.3 Parallax 2.8 3% 3.57 fps	MRender 4.6 Gravity 5.6 Splatting 4.5 4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.29% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 179GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 207 205 207 113 33 MB/s Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.3% Below average	Read 228 Write 131 Mixed 133 SusWrite 161 36% 163 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 27.8 4K Mixed 14.6 60% 20 MB/s	DQ Read 25.3 DQ Write 26.8 DQ Mixed 24.8 19% 25.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 725GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 165 166 166 166 164 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	96.7% Outstanding	Read 172 Write 160 Mixed 107 SusWrite 165 111% 151 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 242% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 96.7% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX2666C16/8G Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 16GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	80% Excellent	MC Read 31.6 MC Write 27.2 MC Mixed 27.3 82% 28.7 GB/s	SC Read 22.1 SC Write 29.3 SC Mixed 24.8 73% 25.4 GB/s	Latency 91.6 44% 91.6 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II Builds (Compare 1,530 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 86%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	262x
Ryzen 5 5600GAMD $132Bench 86%, 14,368 samples	203x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $119Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	180x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	148x
RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)AMDBench 17%, 140,621 samples	127x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $238Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	70x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	52x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	44x
SNVS500G 500GBKingstonBench 186%, 34,043 samples	39x

RAM
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	64x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	56x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 88%, 35,395 samples	56x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $394

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)