Today's hottest deals

HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1998
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 04 '21 at 15:38
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 74.4
1-Core 113
2-Core 230
76% 139 Pts
4-Core 431
8-Core 579
64% 505 Pts
64-Core 579
36% 579 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 1998) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.46% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 7.1
3% 4.47 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 5.1
4% 5.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.46%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Klevv NEO N400 SSD 120GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0722A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 352 355 350 352 355 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 432
Write 317
Mixed 331
SusWrite 347
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 72.9
4K Mixed 24.1
112% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 38.5
79% 155 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 85%
WD Gold 1TB (2016)-$85
915GB free
Firmware: RR07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 187 188 184 192 189 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 225
Mixed 107
SusWrite 189
130% 177 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1
420% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 109%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB HMT451U6BFR8A-PB HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 1315 CT51264BD160BJ.M8F 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.5% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 15.5
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 18.1
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 91.7
44% 91.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 6,591 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback