Asrock H110M-DVS R3.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive51.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock H110M-DVS R3.0  (all builds)
Memory2.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 15 '21 at 00:38
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Memory 90.5
1-Core 113
2-Core 219
81% 141 Pts
4-Core 407
8-Core 428
55% 417 Pts
64-Core 430
27% 430 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
ASRock(1849 5912) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4505
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
5.3% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 5.1
Parallax 6.5
5% 5.8 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 10.3
6% 7.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.3%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$84
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z331
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 86 86 86 86 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 340
Write 111
Mixed 283
SusWrite 92.6
46% 207 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 59.9
4K Mixed 19.2
92% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 62.2
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 25.3
40% 72.8 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 71%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
48GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 12 22 29 28 23 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 44.8
Write 22.8
Mixed 28.4
SusWrite 21.8
37% 29.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1
71% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905622-025.A01G 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
41.4% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 11.4
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 12.8
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-DVS R3.0 Builds (Compare 892 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-DVS R3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback