Asrock H97M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics34.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H97M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150518
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 27 '17 at 09:30
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3-$35
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 86.2
1-Core 107
2-Core 212
77% 135 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 571
59% 474 Pts
64-Core 569
35% 569 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 78%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280-$185
CLim: 940 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 16.12.2
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Lighting 42
Reflection 30.1
Parallax 60.3
34% 44.2 fps
MRender 33.7
Gravity 45.7
Splatting 44
34% 41.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 325
Mixed 390
89% 402 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 32.8
134% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 48.2
87% 168 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 97%
Hitachi HDS721616PLA380 160GB-$46
65GB free
Firmware: P22OABEA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 55.3
Write 56.7
Mixed 56.9
42% 56.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 1.41
4K Mixed 0.33
87% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 39%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
199GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 84
Write 62.5
Mixed 58.6
51% 68.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.18
64% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 59%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$7
15GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
21.8% Poor
Read 89.2
Write 22.8
Mixed 20.2
43% 44.1 MB/s
4K Read 7.68
4K Write 0.68
4K Mixed 0.13
56% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-002.A01LF 99U5471-039.A00LF 99U5471-002.A01LF 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 8192, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.3% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 8.2
26% 9.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 9.7
27% 9.6 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,138 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H97M Pro4 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $674
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback