Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2-$635 10,921 User benchmarks, average bench 76% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	Memory 82.3 1-Core 96.6 2-Core 176 69% 118 Pts	4-Core 331 8-Core 571 55% 451 Pts	64-Core 719 44% 719 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 85%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MG03SCA400 4TB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 3TB free (System drive) Firmware: DG02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 34 35 34 35 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	48.9% Average	Read 137 Write 38.7 Mixed 37.2 SusWrite 33.9 45% 61.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.7 110% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 78%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18JSF1G72PDZ-1G6E Hynix HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 18JSF1G72PDZ-1G6E Hynix HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 18JSF1G72PDZ-1G6E Hynix HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 18JSF1G72PDZ-1G6E Hynix HMT31GR7C... 64GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	95.7% Outstanding	MC Read 39.4 MC Write 38 MC Mixed 36.1 108% 37.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 13 SC Mixed 12.6 39% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 76.3 52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 95.7% Great: 96%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	237x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	219x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	94x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	73x
LCS-256M6S 2.5 7mm 256GBLiteonitBench 83%, 11,477 samples	53x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	44x

RAM
HMT451R7AFR8C-RD 4x4GBHynixBench 82%, 1,002 samples	168x
9JSF51272PZ-1G9E2 4x4GBMicronBench 82%, 908 samples	146x
HMT41GR7AFR4C-RD 4x8GBHynixBench 78%, 598 samples	87x

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $373

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16