Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory24 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime1 Days
Run DateDec 01 '21 at 08:53
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 78.4
1-Core 104
2-Core 204
73% 129 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 514
52% 420 Pts
64-Core 594
37% 594 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.6% Below average
Lighting 40.5
Reflection 43.5
Parallax 39.1
33% 41 fps
MRender 34.5
Gravity 38.8
Splatting 33.3
29% 35.5 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Thnsn5512gvu7 TOSHIBA SAMPLE 512GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 57DA4009
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 260 162 230 229 235 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 1,136
Write 503
Mixed 624
SusWrite 238
138% 625 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 29
4K Mixed 27.5
100% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 839
DQ Write 74.6
DQ Mixed 152
188% 355 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 111%
Great: 250%
Seagate ST14000VN0008-2JG101 14TB
9TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 108 93 105 104 113 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 2% Great: 104%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 138 123 136 134 142 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 141
Write 150
Mixed 97.1
SusWrite 132
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 97%
WD Red 10TB (2017)-$419
3TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 142 118 134 133 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 144
Write 146
Mixed 98.7
SusWrite 132
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.2
318% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST18000NE000-2YY101 18TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: EN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 133 89 140 115 121 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 32% Great: 93%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
88GB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 5.6 6.1 5.6 5.5 8.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
2.44% Terrible
Read 5.7
Write 5
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 6
8% 5.6 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
7% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 2.44%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-16GVK 04CD F4-3200C16-8GVKB 04CD F4-3200C16-16GVK 04CD F4-3200C16-8GVKB 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
65.4% Good
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 22.4
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 24.4
SC Mixed 17.2
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270X-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 863 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5 - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $960
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback