Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 8770w

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteBook 8770w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 176C
Memory0.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140804
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateDec 08 '21 at 11:23
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820QM-$275
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
66.1% Good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 89.9
2-Core 168
67% 113 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 431
43% 351 Pts
64-Core 422
26% 422 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K3000M
HP(103C 176C) 2GB
CLim: 653 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 426.78
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
8% Terrible
Lighting 9.1
Reflection 11
Parallax 11.1
7% 10.4 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 11.2
Splatting 10.3
9% 11.3 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
315GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GS2ZC360
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 36 63 65 67 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Read 9.7
Write 88.8
Mixed 18.4
SusWrite 56.6
32% 43.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.1
38% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 72%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$38
768GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 107 109 107 110 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 101
Write 103
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 108
67% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
52% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.9
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 2.9
34% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 52%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8770w Builds (Compare 580 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8770w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback