PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 32% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME B250M-A (all builds) |
Memory | 8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20161019 |
Uptime | 1.1 Days |
Run Date | Dec 16 '21 at 01:29 |
Run Duration | 226 Seconds |
Run User | AUS-User |
Background CPU | 39% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
63.8%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2256 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.76
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
32%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
410GB free
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 292 344 355 371 352 MB/s
|
70.1%
Very good
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$54
437GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 98 73 50 51 57 MB/s
|
27.5%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
44.4%
Average
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 1,364x |
Core i7-7700Intel $178Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 1,018x |
Core i5-7500Intel $70Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 751x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 570x |
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 493x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 481x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $385 |