Today's hottest deals

Hp-pavilion NY549AA-ABA p6230y

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHp-pavilion NY549AA-ABA p6230y  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN ALOE
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100521
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 04 '17 at 07:25
Run Duration5874 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 74%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 810
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
44.3% Average
Memory 67.4
1-Core 28.6
2-Core 73.3
37% 56.4 Pts
4-Core 122
8-Core 137
17% 130 Pts
64-Core 141
9% 141 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 5400
PwrHis(1787 3000) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
1.32% Terrible
Lighting 1.07
Reflection 1.62
Parallax 1.81
1% 1.5 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 1.33
Splatting 3.39
2% 2.61 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.32%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: D781
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 28.1
Write 26
Mixed 25.5
20% 26.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.83
4K Write 3.39
4K Mixed 0.49
236% 2.24 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 90%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$97
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.01D05
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 117
Write 112
Mixed 109
85% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.03
4K Write 2.12
4K Mixed 0.13
97% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 85%
Toshiba MK8037GS 80GB
12GB free
Firmware: DL232C
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 25
Write 27.3
Mixed 25
19% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.07
4K Mixed 0.23
62% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 24%
WD My Passport 2TB
990GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
1.2% Terrible
Read 0.46
Write 0.36
Mixed 0.41
0% 0.41 MB/s
4K Read 0.21
4K Write 0.33
4K Mixed 0.13
16% 0.22 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 1.2%
Great: 44%
Seagate ST95005620AS 500GB
112GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 25.6
Write 24.4
Mixed 18.9
29% 22.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 0.97
4K Mixed 0.25
43% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 19%
WD 2500BEV External 250GB
60GB free, PID 0702
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
1.06% Terrible
Read 0.45
Write 0.34
Mixed 0.38
0% 0.39 MB/s
4K Read 0.21
4K Write 0.28
4K Mixed 0.17
16% 0.22 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 1.06%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F1 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
29.4% Poor
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 11.3
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 7.5
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NY549AA-ABA p6230y Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion NY549AA-ABA p6230y

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback