HP EliteBook 8770w

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteBook 8770w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 176C
Memory20 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190419
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 28 '21 at 14:51
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3740QM-$220
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 91
2-Core 175
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 479
50% 400 Pts
64-Core 479
30% 479 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia A100-PCIE-40GB
HP(103C 176C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1185 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.51
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.9% Poor
Lighting 27.2
Reflection 28.9
Parallax 25.3
22% 27.1 fps
MRender 35.7
Gravity 24.8
Splatting 29.6
24% 30 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 27%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 153 150 191 200 72 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.1% Below average
Read 257
Write 105
Mixed 107
SusWrite 177
36% 161 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 22.6
4K Mixed 12.6
49% 16.3 MB/s
DQ Read 24.4
DQ Write 25.9
DQ Mixed 22.7
18% 24.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 100%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
33GB free
Firmware: GG2OACY0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 60 59 59 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 60.8
Write 58.8
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 58.8
36% 50.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 58%
ASMT 2115 3TB
581GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 109 109 108 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 76.3
Write 93.1
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 107
122% 87.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.6
177% 2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB HMT351S6CFR8C-PB Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.3% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 10.7
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.2
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 78.1
51% 78.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8770w Builds (Compare 568 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8770w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback