HP EliteBook 8770w

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteBook 8770w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 176C
Memory20.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 14 '21 at 14:38
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3740QM-$220
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 76
1-Core 101
2-Core 198
71% 125 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 485
53% 421 Pts
64-Core 492
30% 492 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia A100-PCIE-40GB
HP(103C 176C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.09
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.3% Poor
Lighting 31.2
Reflection 35.8
Parallax 32
25% 33 fps
MRender 43.9
Gravity 31.5
Splatting 38.1
31% 37.8 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 27%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 243 84 102 76 106 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27% Poor
Read 189
Write 85.7
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 121
26% 119 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 17
4K Mixed 9.4
37% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 14.8
DQ Write 15.9
DQ Mixed 14.5
11% 15.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 27%
Great: 100%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
7GB free
Firmware: GG2OACY0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 58 62 68 62 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 56.7
Write 45.5
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 59.9
34% 46.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
88% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 58%
ASMT 2115 120GB
26GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 27 21 21 24 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 32.7
Write 25.5
Mixed 28
SusWrite 23
36% 27.3 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 6.2
449% 6.27 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 162%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
52.3% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 16.5
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 18.8
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 88.4
45% 88.4 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 17.3" 1280 720 LGD0383
Typical EliteBook 8770w Builds (Compare 568 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8770w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback