Intel S5500BC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics0.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardIntel S5500BC  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20120921
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 09 '22 at 22:05
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5550
CPU1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 93.9
1-Core 76.1
2-Core 152
66% 107 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 582
52% 439 Pts
64-Core 700
43% 700 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 300
Nvidia(10DE 0863) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.00
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.74% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 0.3
1% 0.7 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.8
1% 0.93 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.74%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon L8H-128V2G-HP 128GB
104GB free
Firmware: 2803
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 206
Write 140
Mixed 150
37% 165 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 47.8
4K Mixed 26.8
94% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 27.3
DQ Write 87.1
DQ Mixed 33.5
32% 49.3 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 81%
WD WD1500HLFS-01G6U1 150GB
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.04V02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 110
Write 110
Mixed 70
72% 96.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.4
251% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$49
3.5TB free
Firmware: HP51
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 151
Write 104
Mixed 72.7
81% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1.2
240% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 8 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
42.4% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 13.5
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 9.1
25% 8.63 GB/s
Latency 60.1
67% 60.1 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical S5500BC Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel S5500BC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $72
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback