Today's hottest deals

To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive45.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 10 '22 at 13:26
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User NPL-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470S
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 77.1
1-Core 85.3
2-Core 149
62% 104 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 307
41% 305 Pts
64-Core 277
17% 277 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Zotac(19DA 288B) 1GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
15% Very poor
Lighting 18.1
Reflection 20.7
Parallax 15.1
15% 18 fps
MRender 22.9
Gravity 19.2
Splatting 15.7
15% 19.3 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
DMAX-128GB 128GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R3G07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 184 185 180 184 165 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.9% Average
Read 203
Write 180
Mixed 160
SusWrite 175
40% 179 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 34.3
4K Mixed 23.3
81% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 24.9
DQ Write 57.5
DQ Mixed 31.8
27% 38.1 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 59%
Samsung HD503HI 500GB-$41
373GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 105 105 105 105 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 98.3
Write 37.5
Mixed 56.1
SusWrite 105
55% 74.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 0725 RMB4GB584CA3-13HC 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.5% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 16.2
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 13.8
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 86.1
46% 86.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,806 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback