bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory56GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 56GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory52.6 GB free of 56 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 960 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 960 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 11 '22 at 01:16
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7V12 64-Core
None, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.45 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 65.1
1-Core 110
2-Core 220
72% 132 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 856
77% 649 Pts
64-Core 868
54% 868 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 378GB
344GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 319 316 349 349 350 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 498
Write 502
Mixed 449
SusWrite 328
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 57.6
4K Mixed 39.5
129% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 131
98% 130 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 86%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 136GB
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 137 145 145 146 144 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 97%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 1TB
878GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 38 37 67 68 63 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
41% Average
Read 90.7
Write 73.9
Mixed 78.6
SusWrite 51.4
55% 73.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 2
342% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 41%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None 32GB
0, 0 MHz
1024, 32767 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
137% Outstanding
MC Read 58.5
MC Write 39.9
MC Mixed 65.7
156% 54.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 30.9
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 137%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,549 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback