Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics25.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX504GD
Memory17.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210823
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 11 '22 at 11:55
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 97.8
2-Core 200
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 401
44% 350 Pts
64-Core 399
25% 399 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 69%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 10C1) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.9729
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
25.1% Poor
Lighting 31.8
Reflection 31.4
Parallax 35.3
26% 32.8 fps
MRender 35.1
Gravity 34.4
Splatting 20.4
24% 30 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD My Passport 264F 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 2005
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 171 197 179 172 166 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 355
Write 267
Mixed 318
SusWrite 179
63% 280 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 21.5
4K Mixed 20
70% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 28.4
DQ Mixed 67
50% 68.1 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 85%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
806GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1010 1021 1353 998 1016 968 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
167% Outstanding
Read 1,032
Write 1,420
Mixed 983
SusWrite 1061
254% 1,124 MB/s
4K Read 53.3
4K Write 23.9
4K Mixed 38.5
143% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 716
DQ Write 47.5
DQ Mixed 125
156% 296 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 167%
Great: 410%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56
796GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 58 66 51 89 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
44% Average
Read 90.8
Write 103
Mixed 46.9
SusWrite 62.7
56% 76 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.2
60% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 44%
Great: 70%
Samsung Flash Drive 128GB
88GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 18 22 15 21 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Read 39.5
Write 21.6
Mixed 31
SusWrite 17.7
35% 27.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 4.7
397% 5.7 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 01BA 16GU2X08QJLL42-12-K 24GB
2667, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.6% Very good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 30.7
MC Mixed 23.4
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 24.8
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD Builds (Compare 2,622 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback