Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	19.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	146% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PE_TUF516PE (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX516PE
Memory	8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210820
Uptime	8.7 Days
Run Date	Jan 23 '22 at 11:46
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	IRN-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-11370H 12,227 User benchmarks, average bench 74% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	64.7% Good	Memory 59.3 1-Core 120 2-Core 181 68% 120 Pts	4-Core 377 8-Core 574 59% 475 Pts	64-Core 571 35% 571 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Xe 144,774 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Asus(1043 13DC) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	19.8% Very poor	Lighting 23.7 Reflection 27.3 Parallax 28.9 19% 26.6 fps	MRender 21.9 Gravity 35.5 Splatting 20.5 21% 26 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 19.8% Great: 20%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB 7,990 User benchmarks, average bench 183% 263GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXM7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1039 994 184 162 162 184 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	146% Outstanding	Read 1,042 Write 1,192 Mixed 1,027 SusWrite 454 209% 929 MB/s	4K Read 27.6 4K Write 91.1 4K Mixed 54.3 160% 57.7 MB/s	DQ Read 828 DQ Write 325 DQ Mixed 674 473% 609 MB/s
Poor: 111% ↑ This bench: 146% Great: 253%
Nvme Lexar 500GB SSD 128 User benchmarks, average bench 168% 332GB free Firmware: V2.11.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 817 826 929 870 916 841 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	149% Outstanding	Read 1,094 Write 951 Mixed 630 SusWrite 866 199% 885 MB/s	4K Read 28 4K Write 86.3 4K Mixed 22.3 117% 45.5 MB/s	DQ Read 488 DQ Write 306 DQ Mixed 65.7 138% 286 MB/s
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 149% Great: 238%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB 18,040 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 409GB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 6.8 7.3 17 20 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	3.66% Terrible	Read 4.5 Write 4.2 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 13.8 10% 6.68 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 3.66% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 Crucial CB8GS2666.C8JT 16GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 3200, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	60.8% Good	MC Read 24.7 MC Write 24.2 MC Mixed 19 65% 22.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 21.2 SC Mixed 13.2 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 130 31% 130 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 76%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-11370HIntelBench 74%, 12,227 samples	787x

GPU
Iris XeIntelBench 14%, 144,774 samples	464x
RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop)NvidiaBench 61%, 35,839 samples	320x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2x

SSD
SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GBNvmeBench 183%, 7,990 samples	337x
INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GBNvmeBench 197%, 18,245 samples	211x
HFM512GD3JX013N 512GBNvmeBench 225%, 10,852 samples	26x

RAM
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2B1 1x8GBMicronBench 30%, 1,021 samples	129x
M471A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 19,438 samples	117x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 1x8GBMicronBench 38%, 20,126 samples	64x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16