Today's hottest deals

Asus P8B75-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140806
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 27 '22 at 11:53
Run Duration308 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 86.8
1-Core 99.2
2-Core 195
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 369
50% 373 Pts
64-Core 368
23% 368 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Asus(1043 84CA) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.52% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 1
Parallax 1.3
1% 1.3 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 2.2
2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.52%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 88 82 82 93 101 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.6% Average
Read 188
Write 203
Mixed 185
SusWrite 87.5
37% 166 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 31.3
4K Mixed 25.2
82% 26.1 MB/s
DQ Read 29.7
DQ Write 59.3
DQ Mixed 37.8
31% 42.3 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
190GB free
Firmware: CC4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 104 103 106 111 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 146
Write 154
Mixed 79.7
SusWrite 107
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 112%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$46
25GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 83 84 84 84 81 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 95.2
Write 89
Mixed 59.1
SusWrite 82.8
60% 81.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 69%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0342
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 32.7
Write 26.6
Mixed 23.8
SusWrite 18.7
19% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 99%
WD My Book 25ED 6TB
3.5TB free, PID 25ed
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 156 156 155 154 155 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 154
Mixed 103
SusWrite 155
192% 142 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 10.6
4K Mixed 1.1
468% 10.2 MB/s
DQ Read 0.7
DQ Write 12.1
DQ Mixed 1.1
452% 4.63 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 108%
WD Elements 2TB
340GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 31.9
Write 26.5
Mixed 25.4
SusWrite 16.3
33% 25 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
105% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 44%
Philips USB Flash Drive 32GB
25GB free, PID 4300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 1.1 0.5 1 1.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
0.58% Terrible
Read 1
Write 0.2
Mixed 1
SusWrite 1
1% 0.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
3% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 0.58%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.5% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 13.5
44% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 14
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-M Builds (Compare 1,563 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $906
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback