Asus PRIME A320M-R

Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	54.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME A320M-R (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20211029
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 27 '22 at 15:19
Run Duration	201 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185 123,820 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	76.5% Very good	Memory 76.9 1-Core 107 2-Core 208 73% 130 Pts	4-Core 410 8-Core 658 66% 534 Pts	64-Core 1086 67% 1086 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 8C95) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 511.23 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	54.3% Above average	Lighting 66.7 Reflection 69.6 Parallax 64.5 54% 66.9 fps	MRender 67.9 Gravity 68.3 Splatting 63.2 54% 66.5 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 15 50 52 50 1.2 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	62.6% Good	Read 382 Write 271 Mixed 284 SusWrite 60.4 56% 249 MB/s	4K Read 28 4K Write 73.5 4K Mixed 22.5 110% 41.3 MB/s	DQ Read 160 DQ Write 329 DQ Mixed 130 131% 206 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 85%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 244GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 170 169 170 172 172 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	88.6% Excellent	Read 138 Write 114 Mixed 79.7 SusWrite 170 92% 126 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.2 235% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 109%
QUMO STICKER 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 11GB free, PID 4100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 0.7 0.8 0.6 0.7 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	0.49% Terrible	Read 2.3 Write 1.8 Mixed 1.2 SusWrite 0.7 2% 1.5 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.49% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown QUM4U-8G2400P16 Transcend JM2400HLB-8G 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	86.3% Excellent	MC Read 33.6 MC Write 31.3 MC Mixed 28.5 89% 31.1 GB/s	SC Read 23 SC Write 31.1 SC Mixed 25.8 76% 26.6 GB/s	Latency 86.5 46% 86.5 ns
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME A320M-R Builds (Compare 619 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-R

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	89x
Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples	55x
Ryzen 5 1600AFAMD $97Bench 72%, 52,721 samples	53x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	102x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	57x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	48x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	32x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	30x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	28x

RAM
BLS8G4D30AESEK.M8FE 1x8GBCrucialBench 46%, 2,547 samples	20x
2x4GBAdataBench 60%, 13,050 samples	15x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x8GBTeamBench 73%, 9,275 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $313

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16