Today's hottest deals

Medion MD35121

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive180% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMedion MD35121  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION B560H6-EM2
Memory6.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210819
Uptime13.4 Days
Run DateJan 29 '22 at 21:16
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 56%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400F-$106
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
65.6% Good
Memory 61
1-Core 117
2-Core 215
71% 131 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 565
59% 471 Pts
64-Core 644
40% 644 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$152
Zotac(19DA 9548) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.23
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 26.8
Reflection 23.2
Parallax 24.4
22% 24.8 fps
Gravity 46.1
Splatting 16.9
26% 31.5 fps
Poor: 39% Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme E12S-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS4 1TB
736GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM13.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1409 1645 1885 925 901 893 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 1,043
Write 1,404
Mixed 1,126
SusWrite 1,276
275% 1,212 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 79
4K Mixed 31.6
115% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 711
DQ Write 399
DQ Mixed 535
403% 548 MB/s
Poor: 180%
This bench: 180%
Great: 305%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
58.2% Above average
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 18.6
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 9.7
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MD35121 Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

System: Medion MD35121

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $258
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback