Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3  (all builds)
Memory7.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130122
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '22 at 00:02
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User URY-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.55 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Memory 55.8
1-Core 76.2
2-Core 133
51% 88.4 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 421
42% 341 Pts
64-Core 417
26% 417 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 68%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 38 28 27 27 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 321
Write 36.5
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 32.8
24% 112 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 34.4
4K Mixed 14.9
62% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 35.2
DQ Mixed 65.3
60% 95.9 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 121%
Samsung HD502HI 500GB-$154
77GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 84 84 84 84 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 68
Write 34.5
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 83.9
42% 57.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GBBNAUDEBA 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
23.8% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 7
23% 7.93 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 8.3
23% 8.03 GB/s
Latency 140
28% 140 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-990FXA-UD3 Builds (Compare 1,410 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 - $100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $440
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback