bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive70% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210722
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '22 at 13:45
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.45 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
61.4% Good
Memory 73.9
1-Core 116
2-Core 189
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 288
38% 285 Pts
64-Core 288
18% 288 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 77%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 137GB
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 154 160 164 164 148 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
70% Good
Read 452
Write 159
Mixed 252
SusWrite 150
56% 253 MB/s
4K Read 76.8
4K Write 10.8
4K Mixed 17.1
144% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 77.8
DQ Write 14.3
DQ Mixed 24.4
24% 38.8 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 70%
Great: 70%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 161GB
147GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 221 223 230 229 234 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 395
Write 446
Mixed 431
SusWrite 214
84% 372 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 65.2
4K Mixed 42.7
139% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 62.6
DQ Write 73
DQ Mixed 68.9
52% 68.2 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None 16GB
0, 0 MHz
1024, 15360 MB
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
161% Outstanding
MC Read 60.2
MC Write 50.1
MC Mixed 75.9
177% 62.1 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 48
SC Mixed 40.8
106% 37 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 161%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback