Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H410M S2 V2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics33.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H410M S2 V2  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210120
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '22 at 15:54
Run Duration262 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10105F
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Memory 92.5
1-Core 127
2-Core 214
84% 144 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 516
57% 452 Pts
64-Core 596
37% 596 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Asus(1043 8543) 2GB
CLim: 1468 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.1% Below average
Lighting 42.2
Reflection 46.3
Parallax 40.7
34% 43.1 fps
MRender 36.2
Gravity 40.3
Splatting 36
31% 37.5 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2012)-$79
241GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 31 61 61 59 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
25.5% Poor
Read 37.2
Write 24.1
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 51.4
25% 33.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.2
47% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 63%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$21
324GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 115 115 107 115 116 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
66% Good
Read 116
Write 113
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 114
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 66%
Great: 69%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
362GB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 41 40 35 40 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
20% Very poor
Read 29.9
Write 40.8
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 39.2
26% 35.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20%
Great: 66%
KIOXIA TransMemory 16GB
14GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 7 6.7 13 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
5.07% Terrible
Read 5.7
Write 4.3
Mixed 13.2
SusWrite 11
12% 8.55 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
29% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.07%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 3200 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.5% Below average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 9.1
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 12.4
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H410M S2 V2 Builds (Compare 718 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H410M S2 V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 115% - Outstanding Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback