Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive98.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 21 '17 at 05:09
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 43%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$148
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 94.7
1-Core 106
2-Core 196
78% 132 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 621
59% 486 Pts
64-Core 737
46% 737 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 385.28
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Lighting 142
Reflection 148
Parallax 143
116% 144 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 140
Splatting 110
99% 122 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$234
419GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 400
Mixed 421
99% 445 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 27.8
159% 59.2 MB/s
DQ Read 45.5
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 28.8
60% 114 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
312GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
312GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$79
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 232
Write 170
Mixed 150
137% 184 MB/s
4K Read 3.88
4K Write 3.56
4K Mixed 0.33
265% 2.59 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 116%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$79
3TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 244
Write 178
Mixed 154
143% 192 MB/s
4K Read 4.21
4K Write 3.49
4K Mixed 0.22
265% 2.64 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 121%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 32GB
3139, 3139, 3139, 3139 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 38.5
MC Write 39.4
MC Mixed 32.6
105% 36.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 39.3
SC Mixed 25.3
79% 27.5 GB/s
Latency 58
69% 58 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 101%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 2,044 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $121

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $594
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback