bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive56.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory4.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1852 x 759 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190619
Uptime11.6 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '22 at 12:48
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 67.8
1-Core 109
2-Core 214
71% 130 Pts
4-Core 405
8-Core 384
53% 395 Pts
64-Core 411
25% 411 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 215GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 14 14 33 218 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 568
Write 400
Mixed 375
SusWrite 52
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 14.1
4K Mixed 15.3
57% 16.4 MB/s
DQ Read 291
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 287
220% 296 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 86%
Vmware Virtual disk 429GB
26GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 14 15 34 222 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 31.1
Write 428
Mixed 441
SusWrite 52.8
55% 238 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 14.6
4K Mixed 18.5
67% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 292
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 296
224% 299 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 88%
Vmware Virtual disk 537GB
345GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 16 13 12 28 156 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 320
Write 410
Mixed 334
SusWrite 39.6
62% 276 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 14.4
4K Mixed 15.8
60% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 366
DQ Mixed 160
161% 254 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB 4x16GB
4 of 128 slots used
64GB DIMM DRAM
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
88.1% Excellent
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 60.3
MC Mixed 29.6
102% 35.6 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 8.5
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 206%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback