bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Memory78.1GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 78.1GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory18.7 GB free of 78.125 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1152 x 864 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20120523
Uptime9.9 Days
Run DateSep 18 '19 at 11:52
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
None, 3 CPU, 14 cores, 14 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Memory 43.3
1-Core 35.9
2-Core 70.4
31% 49.9 Pts
4-Core 153
8-Core 394
31% 273 Pts
64-Core 636
39% 636 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 382GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 70 169 181 188 194 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Virtual HD 141GB
88GB free
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 28 64 70 74 76 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Virtual HD 26GB
19GB free
Firmware: 1.1.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 76 177 189 198 208 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78GB
null MHz
3968, 32767, 32767, 10498 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
MC Read 48.5
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 39.5
116% 40.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 7.5
18% 6.17 GB/s
Latency 188
21% 188 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback