PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 48.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 89.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock A320M Pro4 (all builds) |
Memory | 4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190703 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 04 '22 at 00:54 |
Run Duration | 163 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 31% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Athlon X4 950 Quad Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
|
36.3%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.2.3
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
48.1%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190
374GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 342 356 337 296 328 MB/s
|
89.1%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Black 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$45
141GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 79 81 80 77 80 MB/s
|
44%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown R748G2400U2S-UO 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
25.1%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 27x |
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 24x |
Ryzen 5 1400AMD $87Bench 61%, 71,313 samples | 15x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 17x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 15x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 11x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 97% - Outstanding | Total price: $257 |