Asus TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	161% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20211029
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 07 '22 at 22:08
Run Duration	185 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10400-$125 71,804 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	87% Excellent	Memory 92.5 1-Core 120 2-Core 239 85% 151 Pts	4-Core 439 8-Core 749 72% 594 Pts	64-Core 951 59% 951 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 87% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 8626) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.65 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.3% Poor	Lighting 35.4 Reflection 40.8 Parallax 36.8 29% 37.7 fps	MRender 37 Gravity 38.2 Splatting 27.3 27% 34.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Asgard AN3 500NVMe-M.2/80 500GB 466 User benchmarks, average bench 264% 107GB free (System drive) Firmware: 42A2S8MA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 533 427 388 305 384 334 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	161% Outstanding	Read 2,072 Write 1,130 Mixed 127 SusWrite 396 203% 931 MB/s	4K Read 31.3 4K Write 47.7 4K Mixed 36.6 120% 38.5 MB/s	DQ Read 587 DQ Write 155 DQ Mixed 222 202% 321 MB/s
Poor: 161% ↑ This bench: 161% Great: 349%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 849GB free Firmware: CC46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 130 121 129 126 123 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	64.4% Good	Read 99.1 Write 132 Mixed 67.3 SusWrite 125 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 3000 2x8GB 77,202 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3001 MHz Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	82.5% Excellent	MC Read 33.1 MC Write 32 MC Mixed 23 84% 29.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.9 SC Write 33.8 SC Mixed 23.1 69% 24.3 GB/s	Latency 63.1 63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,526 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 143%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 142%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS - $299

CPU
Core i7-10700KIntel $230Bench 97%, 198,859 samples	1,057x
Core i5-10600KIntel $144Bench 92%, 70,951 samples	508x
Core i9-10850KIntel $279Bench 99%, 84,873 samples	249x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	498x
RTX 3080Nvidia $600Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	385x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	251x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $99Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	194x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	135x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	111x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	102x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	91x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	90x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,028

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16