Today's hottest deals

Monster ABRA A5 V13.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive56.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V13.1  (all builds)
MotherboardStandard Standard
Memory1.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180906
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 11 '22 at 11:21
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 11%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
62.7% Good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 56
2-Core 147
57% 95 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 418
39% 326 Pts
64-Core 422
26% 422 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Device(1D05 1042) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1179
Relative performance (0th percentile)
5.12% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 9.4
Parallax 7.3
5% 7.47 fps
MRender 11.6
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 5.2
6% 7.77 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 5.12%
Great: 25%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU800NS38 256GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0427ANR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 71 102 108 99 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 457
Write 287
Mixed 292
SusWrite 101
63% 284 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 27.4
4K Mixed 24.7
82% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 57.4
DQ Mixed 83.9
78% 124 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
40.6% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 11.4
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 11.1
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A5 V13.1 Builds (Compare 345 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A5 V13.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback