Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3

Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	59.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	96.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 (all builds)
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130715
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 15 '22 at 23:37
Run Duration	307 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8370E-$471 5,639 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	64.1% Good	Memory 87.2 1-Core 65.8 2-Core 107 56% 86.7 Pts	4-Core 223 8-Core 338 35% 280 Pts	64-Core 341 21% 341 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% EVGA(3842 6163) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.27 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	59.7% Above average	Lighting 73.9 Reflection 79.5 Parallax 71.5 60% 75 fps	MRender 68.3 Gravity 74.3 Splatting 72.3 59% 71.6 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 303GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 261 296 281 277 265 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	96.4% Outstanding	Read 463 Write 413 Mixed 374 SusWrite 273 86% 381 MB/s	4K Read 37.4 4K Write 91.6 4K Mixed 49.2 168% 59.4 MB/s	DQ Read 148 DQ Write 248 DQ Mixed 213 157% 203 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 96.4% Great: 134%
Crucial_ CT1050MX30 1TB 488 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 437GB free Firmware: M0C SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 256 308 313 307 308 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	77.8% Very good	Read 296 Write 409 Mixed 334 SusWrite 290 75% 332 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 88.6 4K Mixed 35.3 128% 49.3 MB/s	DQ Read 139 DQ Write 248 DQ Mixed 208 154% 198 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 103%
WDC WD60 03FZBX-00K5WB0 6TB 86 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 2.5TB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 134 136 125 135 134 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	17% Very poor	Read 138 Write 140 Mixed 112 SusWrite 132 29% 130 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 8.3 4K Mixed 1.7 11% 4.3 MB/s	DQ Read 3.4 DQ Write 9.3 DQ Mixed 2.7 3% 5.13 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 29%
WDC WD60 03FZBX-00K5WB0 6TB 86 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 2TB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 185 190 185 188 189 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	22.4% Poor	Read 187 Write 188 Mixed 139 SusWrite 187 40% 175 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 9.5 4K Mixed 1.7 11% 4.67 MB/s	DQ Read 3.5 DQ Write 7.2 DQ Mixed 3.9 3% 4.87 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 29%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 1.5TB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 154 163 163 163 163 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	98.1% Outstanding	Read 181 Write 180 Mixed 133 SusWrite 161 121% 164 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 1 220% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 98.1% Great: 112%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$185 20,205 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 1.5TB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 128 133 134 134 133 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	85.2% Excellent	Read 164 Write 152 Mixed 116 SusWrite 132 104% 141 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.1 222% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 85.2% Great: 98%
Philips USB Flash Drive 64GB 94 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 58GB free, PID 6300 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 4.8 9.7 8.5 10 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	7.5% Terrible	Read 22.7 Write 3.7 Mixed 7.8 SusWrite 9.1 12% 10.8 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.7 52% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.5% Great: 27%
Philips USB Flash Drive 124GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 115GB free, PID 6300 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 23 25 24 22 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	23.9% Poor	Read 100 Write 49.5 Mixed 43.5 SusWrite 23.6 63% 54.3 MB/s	4K Read 6.1 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 1.6 108% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 26%
Samsung Flash Drive 128GB 4,330 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 62GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 38 43 40 18 33 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 185 Write 30.5 SusWrite 36.6 77% 84.1 MB/s	4K Read 13.6 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 7.1 295% 6.93 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 113%
Generic- SD/MMC 64GB 132 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 60GB free, PID 0119 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 13 14 13 14 13 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	16.3% Very poor	Read 20.3 Write 15.5 Mixed 19 SusWrite 13.8 23% 17.1 MB/s	4K Read 6.2 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 4 258% 4.37 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 18%
General USB Flash Disk 32GB 113 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 29GB free, PID 8381 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	12% Very poor	Read 40.8 Write 23 Mixed 14.8 SusWrite 14.5 28% 23.3 MB/s	4K Read 12.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 45% 4.07 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 20%
USB 2.0 Flash Drive 16GB 77 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 15GB free, PID 0165 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 8.2 8.3 8.2 8.3 8.4 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	8.64% Terrible	Read 29 Write 7 Mixed 7 SusWrite 8.1 14% 12.8 MB/s	4K Read 11.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 42% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 8.64% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 4x4GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48.1% Average	MC Read 20.4 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 16.9 50% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 12.7 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 70.3 57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-990FXA-UD3 Builds (Compare 1,402 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 - $100

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	570x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	210x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	110x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	74x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	66x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	61x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	46x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	39x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	35x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	106x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	85x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	82x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $439

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16