Today's hottest deals

MSI MAG A520M VECTOR WIFI (MS-7D14)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive150% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D14
MotherboardMSI MAG A520M VECTOR WIFI (MS-7D14)  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200821
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 19 '22 at 18:26
Run Duration264 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 84%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 55.9
1-Core 97.9
2-Core 198
63% 117 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 617
70% 546 Pts
64-Core 1,273
79% 1,273 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$244
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79
Relative performance n/a - GPU benchmark error
Poor: 68% Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB
211GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 573 75 552 128 352 545 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
150% Outstanding
Read 1,107
Write 1,083
Mixed 875
SusWrite 371
192% 859 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 92.5
4K Mixed 53
183% 63.1 MB/s
DQ Read 697
DQ Write 510
DQ Mixed 282
298% 496 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 150%
Great: 277%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB
684GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 24 24 16 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
8.55% Terrible
Read 13.9
Write 23.6
Mixed 12.7
SusWrite 21.4
26% 17.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
31% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.55%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KD48GU880-36A180B 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
75.4% Very good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 33.7
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 15.4
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 140
28% 140 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG A520M VECTOR WIFI (MS-7D14) Builds (Compare 266 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI MAG A520M VECTOR WIFI (MS-7D14)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $248
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback