HP ProDesk 400 G1 MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G1 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 198E
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190424
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 22 '22 at 16:46
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1241 v3-$209
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 110
2-Core 182
75% 127 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 566
56% 456 Pts
64-Core 564
35% 564 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 360
XFX(1682 7360) 2GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1600 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.10.2
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
19% Very poor
Lighting 22.5
Reflection 27.8
Parallax 29.6
18% 26.6 fps
MRender 25.5
Gravity 22.5
Splatting 25.6
20% 24.5 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 19%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$48
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 363 352 335 336 319 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 378
Mixed 308
SusWrite 343
86% 385 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 65.5
4K Mixed 41.4
146% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 184
178% 282 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 101%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
880GB free
Firmware: 1001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 172 188 188 186 183 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 183
Mixed 78.2
SusWrite 183
115% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 107%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 0215 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
58.4% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 18.2
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 15.5
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 400 G1 MT Builds (Compare 1,059 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G1 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback