Today's hottest deals

Toshiba dynabook Satellite B552/H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba dynabook Satellite B552/H  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA dynabook Satellite B552/H
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130625
Uptime84 Days
Run DateMar 24 '22 at 07:52
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
Socket rPGA988B, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
60.1% Good
Memory 88.4
1-Core 61
2-Core 108
56% 85.8 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 183
25% 186 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 0005) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.85% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 1.8
0% 1.17 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 3.7
2% 2.77 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.85%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD032 320GB-$50
272GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX0A4M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 8.3 7.9 6.8 9.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Read 57.7
Write 69.8
Mixed 17.2
SusWrite 10.3
28% 38.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
19% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 54%
USB Disk 3.0 32GB
25GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 13 13 13 14 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
7.4% Terrible
Read 31.7
Write 9.9
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 10.9
15% 13.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.4%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
32% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 9.8
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9.3
27% 9.6 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 32%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical dynabook Satellite B552/H Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba dynabook Satellite B552/H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback