Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR GPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Phdgd

Ivy 4

▲ 500 ▼

Release date ≈ Q4 2016.

Average Bench: 3.59% (459th of 713)

Based on 153 user benchmarks.  Device: 8086 0166 Model: PHDGD Ivy 4
Poor: 3%Average: 3.59% Great: 4%

Popular builds with this GPU

Terrible average bench

The Phdgd Ivy 4 averaged 96.4% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 4.1fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 6.92fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Phdgd Ivy 4 is just 1.21%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Phdgd Ivy 4 performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 4.73fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 2.91fps

Average Bench

(Based on 153 samples)
Rank 4593.59%
Min Avg Max
3.49 Lighting 4.1 4.63
1.8 Reflection 4.73 6.17
2.5 Parallax 2.91 3.19
3.33% 3.91 fps
Min Avg Max
3.5 MRender 4.75 5.71
2.02 Gravity 2.5 2.6
4.47 Splatting 6.92 8.75
4.1% 4.72 fps
User Benchmarks Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Clevo(1558 7102) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 4.0.64.2016
3.58% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 3
4% 3.17 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 5.3
4% 4.47 fps
Legend(17AA 21FA) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 4.0.64.2016
3.5% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 2
Parallax 3
4% 3.1 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 5.1
4% 4.17 fps
HP(103C 179B) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 4.0.64.2016
3.13% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 2.8
3% 2.8 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.8
3% 3.57 fps
HP(103C 179B) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 4.0.64.2016
3.11% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 2.9
3% 2.8 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.8
3% 3.47 fps
Legend(17AA 3977) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 4.0.64.2016
3.08% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 2.7
3% 2.77 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.5
3% 3.63 fps
Dell(1028 053D) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 4.0.64.2016
3.06% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 0.6
Parallax 2.7
3% 2.33 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 2.9
Splatting 4.2
3% 3.8 fps
153 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,749,086 GPUs tested

 Popular Cards (based on 153 benchmarks)

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Hide stale prices
Legend(17AA 3977) 8% 4% ± 0%
Apple(106B 00FA) 5% 3% ± 0%
HP(103C 179B) 5% 4% ± 0%
HP(103C 17DF) 4% 5% ± 3%
Legend(17AA 21FA) 4% 4% ± 0%
HP(103C 1854) 3% 4% ± 1%
Legend(17AA 2203) 3% 4% ± 0%
Sanyo(144D C708) 3% 3% ± 0%
Toshiba(1179 FA50) 3% 3% ± 0%
HP(103C 179C) 3% 4% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 21F3) 3% 4% ± 0%
HP(103C 17A7) 2% 4% ± 0%
HP(103C 18DF) 2% 3% ± 0%
HP(103C 183F) 2% 4% ± 0%
HP(103C 18FE) 1% 3% ± 0%
Toshiba(1179 FB20) 1% 4% ± 0%
Dell(1028 0532) 1% 4% ± 0%
MSI(1462 10C0) 1% 3% ± 0%
Toshiba(1179 FB31) 1% 4% ± 0%
Acer(1025 0712) 1% 3% ± 0%
Toshiba(1179 FA20) 1% 4% ± 0%
Intel(8086 2010) 1% 3% ± 0%
Dell(1028 0597) 1% 4% ± 0%
Dell(1028 0598) 1% 4% ± 1%
HP(103C 183E) 1% 3% ± 0%
HP(103C 218F) 1% 4% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 21FB) 1% 3% ± 0%
Dell(1028 053D) 1% 3% ± 0%
Dell(1028 0533) 1% 4% ± 0%
Sony(104D 90AB) 1% 4% ± 0%
Sony(104D 90A8) 1% 3% ± 0%
Asus(1043 100D) 1% 4% ± 0%
Dell(1028 0569) 1% 3% ± 0%
Toshiba(1179 0001) 1% 4% ± 0%
Acer(1025 0747) 1% 3% ± 0%
Toshiba(1179 0005) 1% 3% ± 0%
Toshiba(1179 0004) 1% 3% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 5018) 1% 3% ± 0%
Dell(1028 0564) 1% 3% ± 0%
Fujitsu(10CF 16C1) 1% 4% ± 0%
Fujitsu(10CF 16C2) 1% 4% ± 0%
Fujitsu(10CF 16C3) 1% 3% ± 0%
HP(103C 194B) 1% 4% ± 0%
Acer(1025 0835) 1% 3% ± 0%
Sanyo(144D C652) 1% 4% ± 0%
Dell(1028 055D) 1% 3% ± 0%
Acer(1025 064B) 1% 4% ± 0%
Sanyo(144D C736) 1% 3% ± 0%
Apple(106B 0102) 1% 3% ± 0%
Toshiba(1179 FB80) 1% 3% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Ivy 4 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 3438G95

CPU
Core i7-3520MIntelBench 53%, 19,660 samples7x
GPU
Ivy 4PhdgdBench 4%, 153 samples6x
SSD
MZ7LN128HCHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 74%, 601 samples4x
Solid State Disk 512GBSpccBench 71%, 30,264 samples2x
120GB 120GBMidasforceBench 63%, 636 samples1x
RAM
F3 DDR3 1866 C11 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 59%, 456 samples4x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 26,681 samples2x
M471B5773DH0-CK0 M471B5773DH0-CH9 4GBSamsungBench 36%, 76 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular Ivy 4 systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 8 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Nvidia RTX 4060
vs Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti
vs Nvidia RTX 4070
vs Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti
vs Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)
vs Nvidia RTX 3070
vs Nvidia RTX 3060
vs Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti
vs Nvidia RTX 3080

713 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
What is the MRender GPU benchmark?
What is the parallax (POM) GPU benchmark?
What is the reflection (HDR) GPU benchmark?
What is the lighting (LDPRT) benchmark?
What is the GPU value for money rating?
What is the effective GPU speed index?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback