Today's hottest deals

Positivo POS-EIH61CE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPositivo POS-EIH61CE  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo POS-EIH61CE
Memory2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130503
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 25 '17 at 21:00
Run Duration101 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G540-$70
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Memory 79.6
1-Core 66.1
2-Core 131
56% 92.2 Pts
4-Core 131
8-Core 128
17% 129 Pts
64-Core 132
8% 132 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Elitegroup(1019 3190) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4101
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.94% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.31
Parallax 0.91
1% 1.07 fps
MRender 1.62
Gravity 0.73
Splatting 1.83
1% 1.39 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.94%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
435GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 70.1
Write 60.8
Mixed 66.6
50% 65.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.23
4K Write 1.32
4K Mixed 0.25
62% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown FLFE85F-C8KL9 0194 SH564568FH8N0QHSCR 4GB
1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
40.8% Average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 12.9
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 12.4
34% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical POS-EIH61CE Builds (Compare 381 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo POS-EIH61CE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $74
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback