Asus H81M-C/BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics54.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H81M-C/BR  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150625
Uptime13.5 Days
Run DateSep 27 '17 at 22:34
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160-$79
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 89.5
1-Core 102
2-Core 163
72% 118 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 264
33% 250 Pts
64-Core 263
16% 263 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
PowerColor(148C 2343) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Lighting 67.5
Reflection 60.9
Parallax 89
55% 72.5 fps
MRender 60.2
Gravity 55.2
Splatting 79
54% 64.8 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
St1000lm024 HN-M101MBB 120GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 508
Write 136
Mixed 186
60% 277 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 90.1
4K Mixed 5.43
88% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 25.9
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 7.08
34% 70.9 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 86%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$25
628GB free
Firmware: 1A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 117
Write 118
Mixed 107
86% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 2.06
4K Mixed 0.15
73% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 87%
WD WDS120G1G0A-00SS50 1TB
105GB free
Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 56.8
Write 92.5
Mixed 59.3
52% 69.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.24
67% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 81%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 4GB
0GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 22.2
Write 6.99
Mixed 12.1
15% 13.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.34
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 1.36
118% 3.04 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GB-$35
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
52.1% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 16.8
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 15.6
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-C/BR Builds (Compare 321 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $156
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback