QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics67.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 17 '22 at 00:23
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 66.2
1-Core 74.6
2-Core 186
60% 109 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 497
54% 430 Pts
64-Core 496
31% 496 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.08
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
67.2% Good
Lighting 92
Reflection 90.7
Parallax 86.6
75% 89.8 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 0.1
Splatting 74.8
52% 63.4 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 76%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 129GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 119 130 75 265 0.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 412
Write 559
Mixed 559
SusWrite 141
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 10.5
4K Mixed 12.3
41% 11.9 MB/s
DQ Read 19.6
DQ Write 19.5
DQ Mixed 19.6
15% 19.6 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
MC Read 39.8
MC Write 40
MC Mixed 36.8
111% 38.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 14
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback